STAR WARS REVISITED VS DESPECIALIZED MOVIE

But in practice it ended up making for disjointed storyвЂ™s and inexplicable story beats that only really work for people that have read the stories already and those people did not want it in the first place.

I get it, he was trying to fill in blanks and tighten continuity and put things for people reading the first time so they would have better understanding in later storylines. I would even go so far as to say I understand it and sympathize with George but it usually no matter how well intended it is.ДЄnother example of it and why I hate it is Chris Claremont adding scenes to Classic X-Men. But it also makes me kind of sad, because this short six-minute scene is actually a perfect expression of what Star Wars films have lost since the original arrived on the big screen more than 40. Especially coming right off of how Vader behaved in Rogue One. While I absolutely appreciate the preservation of history when it comes to Star Wars, I also really enjoy what Scene 38 Re-imagined brings to the table.

STAR WARS REVISITED VS DESPECIALIZED MOVIE

It leaves a lot of the Special Edition stuff, but takes out Jabba and a lot of the unnecessary CGI creatures. Personally, I can live with that because I just want to see how the movie feels with that context added. Technically I am not against some of the idea of clean up and new stuff from a SE/limits of the day standpoint but at the same time some of the original effects were already top tier.Д«ut no my real beef is the story changes, I hate after the fact retconning like that, itвЂ™s not confined to Lucas and I donвЂ™t hate him like some. His A New Hope edit is phenomenal, and he's wrapping up ESB now. This allows him to drop The Phantom Menace altogether an inspired deletion, come to think of it, befitting a genius fan edit.

Prefer the theatrical version as someone who consumed them back when that is all there was.

Star wars revisited vs despecialized